The measured building.

Drawing notation: 5'-3"

Dimension between witness stations under overlapping flights; likely lower-flight projection, but endpoints must be checked before geometry authoring.

Drawing notation: [six drawn tread horizontals between basement and intermediate landing]

Manual stair-line count, not a printed flight-specific quantity. Seven rises appears consistent; independent source recount remains required.

Drawing notation: [fourteen drawn tread horizontals from intermediate landing to first floor]

Manual count including dashed continuation near first-floor slab; independent recount required. No pixel distances used as dimensions.

Drawing notation: 6 drawn treads + 1 terminal rise

Candidate subdivision only; not certified historical per-flight count. Candidate calculation only; its parents are not accepted physical controls.

Drawing notation: 14 drawn treads + 1 terminal rise

Candidate subdivision only; 7+15 matches existing total22 but agreement alone does not certify it. Candidate calculation only; its parents are not accepted physical controls.

Drawing notation: 5'-3" / 6 drawn tread intervals

Depends on candidate six treads and unresolved horizontal witness assignment; do not promote to accepted going. Candidate calculation only; its parents are not accepted physical controls.

Drawing notation: 7'-0" + 5'-3"

Sum of horizontal witnesses, using existing detail-20261011j-1116-m003 for7'-0". The shared break and endpoint classes require confirmation. Candidate calculation only; its parents are not accepted physical controls.

Drawing notation: [six separate horizontal tread surfaces below intermediate landing]

Master crop independently resolves six horizontals; includes the tread surfaces, excludes intermediate landing. No pixel distances used.

Drawing notation: 6 drawn treads + 1 terminal rise

Conventional endpoint interpretation; retain as candidate pending explicit numbered/printed flight quantity.

Drawing notation: [apparent fourteen horizontals including dashed/hidden continuation near first-floor slab]

Consistent with prior IMG_1116 candidate14, but hidden/dashed first-floor continuation prevents full certified recount.

Drawing notation: 14 candidate drawn treads + 1 terminal rise

7+15 remains candidate; printed 15-ft rise versus generic13-ft reference is unresolved and count agreement with22 does not resolve it.

Drawing notation: 12′3″

Printed basement upper-flight horizontal projection from left terminal station22 to right turn station8. Independent printed witness, not inherited from the earlier7′0″+5′3″ candidate sum.

Drawing notation: 3′6¾″

Basement lower-flight transverse source span. Outer wall/rail/string endpoint planes are unclassified; no physical clear width.

Drawing notation: 3′6¾″

Right turn-landing span between short-flight junction and inner drawn wall line. Endpoint class is source wall reference, not a registered finish face.

Drawing notation: [5′3″ is between the left short-flight start line and the right numbered7 turn station]

Endpoint review of the prior63-in projection. Existing lower drawn tread count reused; no recount or computed going.

Drawing notation: [lower numbered strip proceeds page-right toward7; connector rises at right; upper strip proceeds page-left from8 toward22]

Source-local plan progression and bend only; exact landing elevation and 15-ft regional rise remain unresolved.

Drawing notation: [counterclockwise reversal from right-going lower strip to left-going upper strip across the right landing in paper x-right/y-up frame]

No universal180-degree building yaw or full landing walking-line geometry established.

Drawing notation: [3′6¾″ strip/landing references do not classify railing intrusions or finished wall planes]

Printed local spans retained; accepted clear width withheld.

Drawing notation: SOFFIT NOT PLASTERED

Original white printed drawing layer. Leader to lower inclined stair underside. Remains separate from PLASTER SOFFIT recorded at another source region; no numeric withdrawal or universal finish assignment.

Drawing notation: TERRAZZO FLOOR — MARBLE BASE

Original white printed drawing layer. Separate first-floor floor/base clause above slab. Floor finish material only, no thickness or total extent.

Drawing notation: TERRAZZO FLOOR — MARBLE BASE

Original white printed drawing layer. Base material in same first-floor clause; does not classify walls, rail or soffit.

Drawing notation: 5′3″

Original white printed drawing layer. Same printed horizontal witness previously stored as63in candidate. Literal glyph confirmed; lower-flight projection ownership, shared break and finish/nosing endpoint classes remain unresolved.