The measured building.

drawing_scale_paper_inches_per_building_foot

0.25 in

Drawing scale only; not a pixel calibration.

rubber_tile_square_size

16 in

rubber_tile_color_count

2 count

rubber_tile_layout

general_light_statuary_finish

The exact surfaces governed by this isolated note require companion specification review.

Physical courtroom component geometry gate

W257 is not registered to the accepted W8 room transform. The judge's bench lacks complete plan contour, height, profiles and dais relationship. Dais/raised-floor elevation is unresolved. Judge, clerk and counsel desk fabrication dimensions are unresolved. Witness stand, jury seating and public seating are not positively established in the reviewed W257 regions. Door and window finished envelopes are unresolved and companion details are unreviewed. Lighting symbols lack a verified fixture type, count and installation geometry. Wall, ceiling and carving profiles require companion detail/model sheets.

Source-linked analytical 2D control study permitted

1 count

Author a non-exported analytical 2D W257 bench-control study carrying every measurement ID.

W257 to W8 placement registration gate

No W257 component receives a building transform. W238 now independently classifies the W257 north wall as the W8 public-foyer face, but the remaining lateral hand, south/bench boundary, and metric controls are insufficient. The four-corner projective diagnostic remains non-authoring because its fitted controls are provisional and its bench-zone checks are circular. Only the north/public-foyer face is independently classified; the lateral side hand and the remaining fitted intersections are not independently identified finish-face controls. The W8 Room 602 south boundary is a coarse provisional trace through the bench/dais composition rather than a verified room-wall face chain. W257 combines the east and west wall elevation subject; W238 resolves the north/public face but does not resolve the lateral east/west hand. The four fitted controls have zero residual by construction and therefore do not validate the correspondence. The four candidate bench-zone comparisons were selected using the same interpreted bench/dais geometry and are not independent held-out checks. The diagnostic residuals are below the W8 trace uncertainty but cannot overcome incorrect or circular feature classification. No printed coordinate chain shared by both W257 and W8 has been reconciled.

Circular candidate bench-zone diagnostic RMS

1.521957 ft

No W257 component receives a building transform. W238 now independently classifies the W257 north wall as the W8 public-foyer face, but the remaining lateral hand, south/bench boundary, and metric controls are insufficient. The four-corner projective diagnostic remains non-authoring because its fitted controls are provisional and its bench-zone checks are circular. Only the north/public-foyer face is independently classified; the lateral side hand and the remaining fitted intersections are not independently identified finish-face controls. The W8 Room 602 south boundary is a coarse provisional trace through the bench/dais composition rather than a verified room-wall face chain. W257 combines the east and west wall elevation subject; W238 resolves the north/public face but does not resolve the lateral east/west hand. The four fitted controls have zero residual by construction and therefore do not validate the correspondence. The four candidate bench-zone comparisons were selected using the same interpreted bench/dais geometry and are not independent held-out checks. The diagnostic residuals are below the W8 trace uncertainty but cannot overcome incorrect or circular feature classification. No printed coordinate chain shared by both W257 and W8 has been reconciled.

Circular candidate bench-zone diagnostic maximum residual

2.239989 ft

No W257 component receives a building transform. W238 now independently classifies the W257 north wall as the W8 public-foyer face, but the remaining lateral hand, south/bench boundary, and metric controls are insufficient. The four-corner projective diagnostic remains non-authoring because its fitted controls are provisional and its bench-zone checks are circular. Only the north/public-foyer face is independently classified; the lateral side hand and the remaining fitted intersections are not independently identified finish-face controls. The W8 Room 602 south boundary is a coarse provisional trace through the bench/dais composition rather than a verified room-wall face chain. W257 combines the east and west wall elevation subject; W238 resolves the north/public face but does not resolve the lateral east/west hand. The four fitted controls have zero residual by construction and therefore do not validate the correspondence. The four candidate bench-zone comparisons were selected using the same interpreted bench/dais geometry and are not independent held-out checks. The diagnostic residuals are below the W8 trace uncertainty but cannot overcome incorrect or circular feature classification. No printed coordinate chain shared by both W257 and W8 has been reconciled.

W257 north wall to W8 public-foyer face identity

1 count

No W257 component receives a building transform. W238 now independently classifies the W257 north wall as the W8 public-foyer face, but the remaining lateral hand, south/bench boundary, and metric controls are insufficient. The four-corner projective diagnostic remains non-authoring because its fitted controls are provisional and its bench-zone checks are circular. Only the north/public-foyer face is independently classified; the lateral side hand and the remaining fitted intersections are not independently identified finish-face controls. The W8 Room 602 south boundary is a coarse provisional trace through the bench/dais composition rather than a verified room-wall face chain. W257 combines the east and west wall elevation subject; W238 resolves the north/public face but does not resolve the lateral east/west hand. The four fitted controls have zero residual by construction and therefore do not validate the correspondence. The four candidate bench-zone comparisons were selected using the same interpreted bench/dais geometry and are not independent held-out checks. The diagnostic residuals are below the W8 trace uncertainty but cannot overcome incorrect or circular feature classification. No printed coordinate chain shared by both W257 and W8 has been reconciled.

W238 7'-6-inch candidate control minus W8 traced public-door span

0.429 ft

No W257 component receives a building transform. W238 now independently classifies the W257 north wall as the W8 public-foyer face, but the remaining lateral hand, south/bench boundary, and metric controls are insufficient. The four-corner projective diagnostic remains non-authoring because its fitted controls are provisional and its bench-zone checks are circular. Only the north/public-foyer face is independently classified; the lateral side hand and the remaining fitted intersections are not independently identified finish-face controls. The W8 Room 602 south boundary is a coarse provisional trace through the bench/dais composition rather than a verified room-wall face chain. W257 combines the east and west wall elevation subject; W238 resolves the north/public face but does not resolve the lateral east/west hand. The four fitted controls have zero residual by construction and therefore do not validate the correspondence. The four candidate bench-zone comparisons were selected using the same interpreted bench/dais geometry and are not independent held-out checks. The diagnostic residuals are below the W8 trace uncertainty but cannot overcome incorrect or circular feature classification. No printed coordinate chain shared by both W257 and W8 has been reconciled.