The measured building.

drawing_scale_paper_inches_per_building_foot

0.75 in

Drawing scale only; not a pixel calibration.

overall_plan_width_corroboration

6 ft

Overall width across the W238 rear elevation; independently matches IMG_0900 and IMG_0901.

overall_front_to_back_depth_corroboration

2.666667 ft

Overall depth above the clerk desk section; independently matches IMG_0900 and IMG_0901.

overall_elevation_height_corroboration

2.833333 ft

Overall height alongside the W238 clerk desk rear elevation; independently matches IMG_0900 and IMG_0901.

half_rear_elevation_width

5.5 ft

Printed half-width to the centerline; retain separately from the calculated full width.

symmetric_full_rear_elevation_width

11 ft

Symmetry calculation only; does not establish plan footprint or placement.

Calculated from: court602-w238-judge-desk-half-rear-width

rear_elevation_height

2.833333 ft

Vertical control at the W238 half rear elevation.

section_horizontal_run_control

6.833333 ft

Clearly printed within SECTION JUDGE'S DESK, but exact endpoint ownership is not yet classified; not authoring-eligible.

door_leaf_height

8 ft

Vertical dimension alongside the leather-covered door leaf.

ornamental_assembly_height

17.25 ft

Overall vertical dimension to the top of the ornamental arched entrance composition.

single_leaf_plan_control

3.666667 ft

Local plan control across one door leaf; do not substitute for accepted clear opening width.

entrance_plan_control_candidate

7.5 ft

Printed below the entrance plan. It is a useful comparison to W8's traced 7.071-foot public-door span, but exact W238 endpoints remain unresolved.

entrance_plan_outer_control_candidate

9.75 ft

Printed outer control below the entrance plan; do not treat as clear opening or jamb-to-jamb dimension until endpoints are classified.

bronze_kick_plate_height

8 in

door_face_finish

overall_rail_height

3 ft

Vertical dimension from floor/base datum to the top rail in the W238 elevation.

repeat_bay_center_control

2.875 ft

One repeated bay control in the W238 balustrade elevation; exact post-face/centerline endpoints need profile coordination before fabrication.

double_acting_gate_thickness

4 in

ornamental_grille_width

4.791667 ft

Horizontal dimension across the removable grille panel.

ornamental_grille_height

3.854167 ft

Vertical dimension across the removable grille panel.

grille_thickness

1 in

material_and_service

ceiling_design_count_repeated

3 count

Design-type count only; installed bay count and room coordinates remain unresolved.

Three-source clerk-desk local dimensional-envelope gate

1 count

A clearly labeled source-local 6'-0" × 2'-8" × 2'-10" dimensional envelope, linked to all three source readings.

Calculated from: court602-w238-clerk-desk-overall-width, court602-w238-clerk-desk-overall-depth, court602-w238-clerk-desk-overall-height, court602-clerks-desk-overall-width, court602-clerks-desk-overall-depth, court602-clerks-desk-overall-height

W238 physical component geometry gate

complete profiles and joinery approval/correction resolution as-built confirmation missing W239 reverse-side door detail complete grille module and duct details

W238 Room 602 building-placement gate

accepted W257-to-W8 metric registration verified finish-face chains independent placed footprint controls accepted instance handedness

W257 to W8 placement registration gate

No W257 component receives a building transform. W238 now independently classifies the W257 north wall as the W8 public-foyer face, but the remaining lateral hand, south/bench boundary, and metric controls are insufficient. The four-corner projective diagnostic remains non-authoring because its fitted controls are provisional and its bench-zone checks are circular. Only the north/public-foyer face is independently classified; the lateral side hand and the remaining fitted intersections are not independently identified finish-face controls. The W8 Room 602 south boundary is a coarse provisional trace through the bench/dais composition rather than a verified room-wall face chain. W257 combines the east and west wall elevation subject; W238 resolves the north/public face but does not resolve the lateral east/west hand. The four fitted controls have zero residual by construction and therefore do not validate the correspondence. The four candidate bench-zone comparisons were selected using the same interpreted bench/dais geometry and are not independent held-out checks. The diagnostic residuals are below the W8 trace uncertainty but cannot overcome incorrect or circular feature classification. No printed coordinate chain shared by both W257 and W8 has been reconciled.

Circular candidate bench-zone diagnostic RMS

1.521957 ft

No W257 component receives a building transform. W238 now independently classifies the W257 north wall as the W8 public-foyer face, but the remaining lateral hand, south/bench boundary, and metric controls are insufficient. The four-corner projective diagnostic remains non-authoring because its fitted controls are provisional and its bench-zone checks are circular. Only the north/public-foyer face is independently classified; the lateral side hand and the remaining fitted intersections are not independently identified finish-face controls. The W8 Room 602 south boundary is a coarse provisional trace through the bench/dais composition rather than a verified room-wall face chain. W257 combines the east and west wall elevation subject; W238 resolves the north/public face but does not resolve the lateral east/west hand. The four fitted controls have zero residual by construction and therefore do not validate the correspondence. The four candidate bench-zone comparisons were selected using the same interpreted bench/dais geometry and are not independent held-out checks. The diagnostic residuals are below the W8 trace uncertainty but cannot overcome incorrect or circular feature classification. No printed coordinate chain shared by both W257 and W8 has been reconciled.

Circular candidate bench-zone diagnostic maximum residual

2.239989 ft

No W257 component receives a building transform. W238 now independently classifies the W257 north wall as the W8 public-foyer face, but the remaining lateral hand, south/bench boundary, and metric controls are insufficient. The four-corner projective diagnostic remains non-authoring because its fitted controls are provisional and its bench-zone checks are circular. Only the north/public-foyer face is independently classified; the lateral side hand and the remaining fitted intersections are not independently identified finish-face controls. The W8 Room 602 south boundary is a coarse provisional trace through the bench/dais composition rather than a verified room-wall face chain. W257 combines the east and west wall elevation subject; W238 resolves the north/public face but does not resolve the lateral east/west hand. The four fitted controls have zero residual by construction and therefore do not validate the correspondence. The four candidate bench-zone comparisons were selected using the same interpreted bench/dais geometry and are not independent held-out checks. The diagnostic residuals are below the W8 trace uncertainty but cannot overcome incorrect or circular feature classification. No printed coordinate chain shared by both W257 and W8 has been reconciled.

W257 north wall to W8 public-foyer face identity

1 count

No W257 component receives a building transform. W238 now independently classifies the W257 north wall as the W8 public-foyer face, but the remaining lateral hand, south/bench boundary, and metric controls are insufficient. The four-corner projective diagnostic remains non-authoring because its fitted controls are provisional and its bench-zone checks are circular. Only the north/public-foyer face is independently classified; the lateral side hand and the remaining fitted intersections are not independently identified finish-face controls. The W8 Room 602 south boundary is a coarse provisional trace through the bench/dais composition rather than a verified room-wall face chain. W257 combines the east and west wall elevation subject; W238 resolves the north/public face but does not resolve the lateral east/west hand. The four fitted controls have zero residual by construction and therefore do not validate the correspondence. The four candidate bench-zone comparisons were selected using the same interpreted bench/dais geometry and are not independent held-out checks. The diagnostic residuals are below the W8 trace uncertainty but cannot overcome incorrect or circular feature classification. No printed coordinate chain shared by both W257 and W8 has been reconciled.

W238 7'-6-inch candidate control minus W8 traced public-door span

0.429 ft

No W257 component receives a building transform. W238 now independently classifies the W257 north wall as the W8 public-foyer face, but the remaining lateral hand, south/bench boundary, and metric controls are insufficient. The four-corner projective diagnostic remains non-authoring because its fitted controls are provisional and its bench-zone checks are circular. Only the north/public-foyer face is independently classified; the lateral side hand and the remaining fitted intersections are not independently identified finish-face controls. The W8 Room 602 south boundary is a coarse provisional trace through the bench/dais composition rather than a verified room-wall face chain. W257 combines the east and west wall elevation subject; W238 resolves the north/public face but does not resolve the lateral east/west hand. The four fitted controls have zero residual by construction and therefore do not validate the correspondence. The four candidate bench-zone comparisons were selected using the same interpreted bench/dais geometry and are not independent held-out checks. The diagnostic residuals are below the W8 trace uncertainty but cannot overcome incorrect or circular feature classification. No printed coordinate chain shared by both W257 and W8 has been reconciled.

clerk_section_lower_horizontal_witness

26 in

Clerk desk section lower horizontal witness. Distinct from2ft8in upper/overall depth reading; no outer-to-clear conversion or building placement.

Calculated from: court602-w238-clerk-desk-overall-depth

judge_section_platform_top_finish

Leader at platform upper surface adjoining judge desk section. Applies to source depicted floor face; no tile thickness, color or full courtroom extent.

judge_section_local_vertical_platform_witness_unresolved_fraction

Numeric value unresolved

Vertical source witness beside MARBLE BASE. Small fraction is not secure; value remains null and is not the desk overall height or the6ft10in horizontal candidate.

entrance_plan_intermediate_horizontal_control

60 in

Intermediate horizontal plan witness above the 3ft8 leaf control. Left endpoint is outside photographed frame; do not assign clear opening or leaf width.

judge_desk_section_top_horizontal_control

32 in

Section witness across top/front-to-back extent of depicted judge desk; no complete plan footprint or installed room assignment.

platform_section_center_rib_horizontal_control

8 in

Local thickness witness across central stippled platform support between the two section voids. Does not establish material strength or accepted structural member.

platform_section_right_wall_horizontal_control

4 in

Separate right end-wall thickness witness in platform section; not the left 4-inch control already registered.

platform_left_base_material

Leader at exterior left face of judge platform section names marble base. Height, profile, stone selection and actual installation remain unresolved.

judge_worktop_left_band_horizontal_control

5.5 in

Original judge-plan top dimension chain: left edge band. Individual source-local control, not installed quantity or complete judge worktop envelope; drawing continues to right.